Study Learn how to Pursue Christian Unity from Two Males Who Didn’t

Discover Factors of Connectiton

It will be actually good if we lived in a world the place Christians didn’t disagree with one another. However we do stay in a world the place Christians disagree. I believe if we’ve had any expertise in any respect of being within the church or realizing church historical past, we notice this. It’s a actuality. Christians don’t all the time assume the identical means, and it’s actually exhausting to know what to do with that.

A method of coping with it’s to attempt to extract ourselves from a heated scenario we’re in and take into consideration one other story that we don’t have a stake in, that we will take a look at and study and draw some classes from in an goal means that doesn’t contain us. After which we will come again into our present context and assume, What did I be taught from that? What did I be taught from that story that I may use as I negotiate or observe battle round me?

This story of John Owen and Richard Baxter is a very attention-grabbing one. It’s a very sobering one. It’s a narrative that doesn’t go effectively. They don’t agree, they usually don’t do a very good job of not agreeing. They don’t ever come to settlement. The connection simply type of will get worse and worse, and the gap will get an increasing number of.

In order I’ve considered that story (and I’ve considered it so much), I’ve questioned what we may be taught from that story that might assist us in our present day, once we could be so polarized and it’s so exhausting to see and perceive the opposite particular person. And I believe one of many key classes that I’ve discovered from that story is that we’re very fast to miss the frequent floor.

After I take into consideration John Owen and Richard Baxter, they’d a lot in frequent. It was unimaginable! If any two males ought to have been capable of get alongside effectively and share frequent names, it was these two. However by some means they struggled to give attention to what held them collectively. As an alternative, they centered on what drew them aside.

And people variations had been actually, within the scheme of issues, vital however comparatively slim in comparison with all the things else that they held in frequent—not least a standard love of God, a dedication to his church, and a dedication to the gospel. There was heaps that they might have shaped an affinity over, however they only couldn’t do it.

What do we’ve got in frequent? What can we agree on? The place can we discover factors of affinity?

For me, that’s a very powerful lesson from their story is that if we discover ourselves in a context the place we aren’t agreeing with another person, as a substitute of minutely analyzing that and excavating it and making a lot of it, if we may simply shift our body of focus and assume, What do we’ve got in frequent? What can we agree on? The place can we discover factors of affinity?

And we might not resolve these slim factors of disagreement, however no less than once we disagree, we accomplish that in a means that’s amicable and that does justice to the burden on us to show love, kindness, humility, and generosity. And it’s exhausting to do this within the context of disagreement, however that’s when it counts. That’s in all probability the primary lesson I’d take from their story.

Tim Cooper is the creator of When Christians Disagree: Classes from the Fractured Relationship of John Owen and Richard Baxter.

Associated Articles